escar USA Papers

2026:

• Arora, A. & Kumar, S. (2026). The EV Cyber Kill Chain: From Charging Port to Cloud — Attacks, Missed Signals, and What Industry Must Fix Next. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20596423
• Murray, B. & Sonalker, A. (2026). Constructive Assurance Cases for Product Cybersecurity. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20596635
• Arif, H.A.; Khalilian, A.; Kiyani, S. & Malik, H. (2026). Physics Informed Dual Channel Metalens Enabled Polarization Fingerprints for Rapid Contactless Hardware Authentication. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20596715
• Acharya, B.; Balenson D.; Espinoza D.; Lauzon, S.; Papadopoulos, C. & Thanasoulas S. (2026). Persistent Personal Data Exposure Across Vehicle Ownership and Control Transitions. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20596822

2025:

• Barki, A. & Mange, J. (2025). ISO/SAE 21434-based automotive risks assessment revisited. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18716275
• Ziv, O. & Alfasi, E. (2025). Fast and compromised: Automotive security on a timer. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18716321

2024:

• Hass, B. & Wolleschensky, L. (2024). Tuning CVSS for better vulnerability handling. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18715862
• Huq, N.; Kropotov, V.; Lin, P. & Vosseler, R. (2024). Opportunities, monetization, and cybersecurity threats in the connected vehicle landscape. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18715954
• Irmscher, T.; Enderle, T.; Ourad, A. & Pelletier, Z. (2024). Full-vehicle testing: The silver bullet for cybersecurity homologation? escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18716229
• Lambert, R. (2024). The software defined vehicle: A security domain comparison. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18716106
• Lee, Hu.; Lee, Hy.; Jun, S. & Kim, H.K. (2024). Expanding the attack scenarios of SAE J1939: A comprehensive analysis of established and novel vulnerabilities in transport protocol. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18715820
• Menon, S.; Sapin, E.; Mahbub, S.H.; Ge, J.; Zhang L. & Brendl, M. (2024). Towards automated live-patching of AUTOSAR adaptive applications. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18716134
• Pimentel, J. (2024). Elicitation of privacy requirements and design specifications for new automotive product designs and implications for current automotive privacy standardization. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18715899
• Sakon, T.; Fujii, K.; Matsuda, H. & Hashimoto, H. (2024). Weakness analysis method using public weakness emulations in the product development phase. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18716177
• Veredas, R.P. & Mehaboobe, Y. (2024). Exploring the risks in connected fleets: A study of two real-world cases. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18716041

2023:

• Jepson, J.; Mukherjee, S. & Daily, J. (2023). CANLay: A user-centered overlay for in-vehicle data dissemination in a network virtualized testbed. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18714764
• Kayas, G.; Pelletier, Z.; Gordon, D.; Arnston, T. & Payton, J. (2023). AI-assisted vulnerability analysis and classification framework for UDS on CAN-bus fuzzer. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18714709
• Kumar, S. & Daily, J. (2023). Securing vehicle diagnostics communication. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18715739
• Mott, C.; Pereira, S.; Johnson, M. & Mikulski, D. (2023). Uptane automotive secure software update framework applied to robotic and autonomous systems. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18715705
• Rathweg, A.; Osman, A.; Fleig, A.; Katsigianni, E. & Tschache, A. (2023). Impacts of post-quantum cryptography on automotive security: A case study. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18715769

2022:

• Hirano, R.; Kishikawa, T.; Ujiie, Y.; Haga, T.; Matsushima, H.; Imamoto, Y.; Yokota, K. & Anzai, J. (2022). Runtime security of virtualization platform for cockpit domain controller. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18714517
• Johnson, J.; Berg, T.; Anderson, B. & Wright, B. (2022). Review of electric vehicle charger cybersecurity vulnerabilities, potential impacts, and defenses. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18714450
• Kulandaivel, S.; Jain, S.; Guajardo, J. & Sekar, V. (2022). CANdid: A stealthy stepping-stone attack to bypass authentication on ECUs. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18714273
• Liedtke, T. & Webb, J. (2022). Risk assessment based on ISO/SAE 21434:2021 – Experiences. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18714653
• Shahriar, M.H.; Xiao, Y.; Moriano, P.; Lou, W. & Hou, Y.T. (2022). CANShield: Signal-based intrusion detection for controller area networks. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18714375

2017:

• Bragaglia, E.; Nesci, W. & Senni, C. (2017). A framework for vehicle penetration tests. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18713984
• Daily, J.; Jonson, U. & Gamble, R. (2017). Talent generation for vehicle cyber security. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18714079
• Elkins, M. (2017). A peer-to-peer approach to digital key sharing for vehicle access control. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18714105
• Henry, K.J.; Bottinelli, P. & Ebeid, N. (2017). Entropy and randomness in vehicular environments and V2X applications. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18713891
• Lapczynski, P.; Heinemann, H.; Schoneberger, T. & Metzker, D.E. (2017). Automatically generating fuzz tests from automotive communication databases. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18714148
• Wiersma, N. & Pareja, R. (2017). Safety doesn’t equal security: A security assessment of the resilience against fault injection attacks in ASIL-D certified microcontrollers. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18714202
• Yan, W.; Kitchen, M. & Ma, D. (2017). Toward automated and black-box vehicle cybersecurity testing. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18714037

2016:

• Angermeier, D. & Eichler, J. (2016). Risk-driven security engineering in the automotive domain. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18713551
• Carter, J.M. & Paul, N. (2016). Towards a scalable group vehicle-based security system. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18713676
• Thuen, C. (2016). Commonalities in vehicle vulnerabilities. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18713819
• Wittenberg, D.K.; Smith, J.; Gray, R. & Eakman, G. (2016). Automotive vulnerability detection system. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18713753

2015:

• Berg, J.; Pommer, J.; Jin, C.; Malmin, F. & Kristensson, J. (2015). Secure gateway – A concept for an in-vehicle IP network bridging the infotainment and the safety critical domains. escar USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18713360